[isabelle-dev] Gromov Hyperbolicity

[Fabian Immler]

> Am 18.01.2018 um 14:36 schrieb Tobias Nipkow <nipkow at in.tum.de>:
> 
> 
> 
> On 18/01/2018 11:06, Fabian Immler wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2018 um 08:32 schrieb Tobias Nipkow <nipkow at in.tum.de>:
>>> 
>>> 1. Library/Complement contains both new generic material like "t3_space" but also new concepts like [mono_intros] for more automation in proving of inequalities. In short, there is a wealth of material that might be suitable for inclusion in HOL-Analysis.
>>> I have already made a start by moving a few [simp] rules but that is it from me because I am not familiar enough with the Analysis material.
>> Most of this looks like it could go to HOL-Analysis.
>>> 2. Hausdorff_Dinstance, Metric_Completion and Isometries stronly smell of generic concepts that should go somewhere else.
>>> We need a discussion on whether any of the theories deserve a separate AFP entry.
>> In my opinion, Hausdorff_Distance and Metric_Completion are general enough to put them to HOL-Analysis.
>> (They are also relatively short, so I am not sure if it is worth to create separate AFP entries.)
>> The theory Isometries contains Lipschitz maps, isometries, geodesic spaces, and quasi-isometries.
>> The very same definition of Lipschitz maps is also in AFP/Ordinary_Differential_Equations, so I take this as a strong indication to move Lipschitz maps to HOL-Analysis. Isometries also seem like a generically useful concept and could go to HOL-Analysis.
> 
> A lot of things are useful, but Isometries.thy is large and would also make a nice AFP entry.
With "Isometries" I meant the part of Isometries.thy that introduces isometry_on (this is only 150 lines). Lipschitz maps are another 350 lines.
The rest of Isometries.thy seems to be about geodesic spaces and quasi-isometries could indeed make a separate AFP entry.

Fabian

>> My impression is that geodesic spaces and quasi-isometries are more specialised concepts (but that might also be just because I have never come across them up to now...). I have no real opinion on what to do with them.
>> We do not have a precise specification of what HOL-Analysis is or should be. I think that makes it very hard to draw a line between material that should go to HOL-Analysis and what should remain in the AFP. So take this as just my personal view.
>> Fabian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> isabelle-dev mailing list
> isabelle-dev at in.tum.de
> https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5026 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman46.in.tum.de/pipermail/isabelle-dev/attachments/20180118/1ee0b4b5/attachment.bin>