[isabelle-dev] Rules of conduct

[Makarius]

On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Florian Haftmann wrote:

> (want to add something for clarity)
>> * to adjust the technical conditions accordingly.  A single critical
>> point is the »administrative repository« access at TUM, about which
>> certain ideas have been floating around over the last years but which
>> never evolved into technical consequences, e.g.
>>   * moving the »main« repository from TUM to a hosting service, with
>> separate access administration
>>   * to pluck up courage and adjust the access permissions to the TUM
>> repository, in discussion and consent with the people from whom it is
>> going to be revoked then
>
> The access policy than has to follow transparent rules also.

This is a very delicate question, it covers the core administrative 
structure of the project.  My position on this has always been of not 
touching the status quo, while occasionally speculating about 
alternatives.  I am still on the status quo if you would ask me today.


 	Makarius