[isabelle-dev] [isabelle] Tiny minor backward-compatible changes to IFOL

[Klein, Gerwin (Data61, Kensington NSW)]

Yes, I’d be happy with that, and specifically with ∃⇩≤⇩1 + standard keyboard abbreviation.

Cheers,
Gerwin

> On 11 May 2020, at 00:56, Lawrence Paulson <lp15 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> It would be great if we could finalise the proposal for the uniqueness quantifier.
> 
> I was planning to do this in a strictly upward compatible way, so with no implications for the existing quantifier notations and no changes to existing theorems, but a few new theorems. For that I think that "∃⇩≤⇩1” is a standard notation and works well enough. The notation “∃!” for unique existence is also absolutely standard and surely does not need to change.
> 
> Larry
> 
>> On 2 May 2020, at 18:17, Makarius <makarius at sketis.net> wrote:
>> 
>> In contrast, the other idea "∃⇩≤⇩1" from Mathoverflow would come out for Ex1
>> as "∃⇩=⇩1" or "∃⇩1", and thus introduce an incoherence of notation.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> isabelle-dev mailing list
> isabelle-dev at in.tum.de
> https://mailman46.in.tum.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev