[isabelle-dev] Future of permanent_interpretation
Clemens Ballarin
ballarin at in.tum.de
Mon Nov 9 20:58:24 CET 2015
On 09 November, 2015 11:56 CET, Makarius <makarius at sketis.net> wrote:
> It is formally trivial to have 'permanent_interpretation' in Isabelle/Pure
> as separate command. If there is a simple way to have just one
> 'interpretation' command with 'defines' vs. 'rewrites', I would prefer
> that.
I would prefer to just have 'interpretation' as well. Possibly 'sublocale' should also be extended by a 'defines' clause.
Clemens
More information about the isabelle-dev
mailing list